<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Doug King Photography	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk</link>
	<description>Fine art photos for sale</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:21:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Osmington Mills by Doug King		</title>
		<link>https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/osmington-mills/#comment-91</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 23:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/?p=540#comment-91</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/osmington-mills/#comment-90&quot;&gt;John&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes - teetering down the slope in the dark was a bit hairy, even with a head torch!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/osmington-mills/#comment-90">John</a>.</p>
<p>Yes &#8211; teetering down the slope in the dark was a bit hairy, even with a head torch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Osmington Mills by John		</title>
		<link>https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/osmington-mills/#comment-90</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/?p=540#comment-90</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s a great place Doug but very muddy and slippery approach!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a great place Doug but very muddy and slippery approach!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on New Toy by John Cordon		</title>
		<link>https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/new-toy/#comment-62</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Cordon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2020 11:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/?p=486#comment-62</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good choice Doug! I have been considering a 5DSR as an upgrade from my 5D3 but decided against it as my photography includes travel work as well as landscape and beauty. 
I had an R and an RP with the f1.2 50mm on loan from Canon for two weeks at Christmas and was rather underwhelmed though the lens was amazing and mega heavy. 
I am sticking to my 5D3 for now ‘cos it’s bloody good]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good choice Doug! I have been considering a 5DSR as an upgrade from my 5D3 but decided against it as my photography includes travel work as well as landscape and beauty.<br />
I had an R and an RP with the f1.2 50mm on loan from Canon for two weeks at Christmas and was rather underwhelmed though the lens was amazing and mega heavy.<br />
I am sticking to my 5D3 for now ‘cos it’s bloody good</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on New Toy by David Crouch		</title>
		<link>https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/new-toy/#comment-61</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Crouch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 16:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.dougkingphotography.co.uk/?p=486#comment-61</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Doug for detailed comments most of which I understood! The R 5 seemed to me to be the answer to the shortcomings so far from Canon in mirrorless but under the skin there are really few improvements for a stills photographer. Indeed the reported overheating for 8K video is a little disconcerting so I think 7/10 could do better should be the offered mark.
Now my new Kase high end filter set is a different story....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Doug for detailed comments most of which I understood! The R 5 seemed to me to be the answer to the shortcomings so far from Canon in mirrorless but under the skin there are really few improvements for a stills photographer. Indeed the reported overheating for 8K video is a little disconcerting so I think 7/10 could do better should be the offered mark.<br />
Now my new Kase high end filter set is a different story&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
